Competition success magazine use full for civil services students Published this article A deeper analysis revealed that the EPR regulations in India were not quantified through collection or recycling targets as in other countries with better implementation framework and mechanisms. In the absence of targets and in a relatively lax regulatory environment producers had little incentive to ensure the collection of their used products. This resulted in the e-waste rules being amended in 2016 to include collection targets and implementing a depositrefund system (DRS) by the producers (Government of India 2016). In a DRS an upfront deposit is charged to the consumer at the time of purchase of the product and the deposit is refunded when the product is safely returned to the producer. The initial targets (collection rate of 30% in the first two years and 70% by the end of seven years) were met with resistance by the industry. Manufacturers lobbied to relax the norms consequently leading to a reduction in the collection targets (10% in the first two years though still continuing to reach 70% by the end of seven years) through an amendment to the rules in 2018 competition success review magazine buy.
No comments:
Post a Comment